Kenya

Stories from the field from all over the world.

Kenya

What Determines Gender Inequality in Household Food Security in Kenya? Application of Exogenous Switching Treatment Regression

Effects of Agricultural Commercialization on Food Crop Input Use and Productivity in Kenya

What Determines Gender Inequality in Household Food Security in Kenya? Application of Exogenous Switching Treatment Regression

The objective of this report is to analyze the effects of smallholder commercialization on food crop input use and productivity in rural Kenya. The main research issues were: (1) To examine the determinants of smallholder fertilizer use on food crops, with a focus on the effects of household and regional agricultural commercialization; (2) To examine the determinants of food crop productivity, again with a focus on the effects of commercialization; and (3) To discuss the implications of the findings for policy and additional research necessary to improve the contribution of cash cropping to rural food productivity growth and food security. A main premise of the paper is that the effects of commercialization are not uniform and cannot be generalized. The effects are hypothesized to differ both according to differences in the institutional/contractual arrangements between firms and smallholders, management decisions, and the level of credit and extension support provided to smallholders by the various private and parastatal firms involved in promoting smallholder cash crops.

Summary

This paper explores the link between the gender of a household head and food security in rural Kenya. The results show that the food security gap between male-headed households (MHHs) and female-headed households (FHHs) is explained by their differences in observable and unobservable characteristics. FHHs’ food security status would have been higher than it is now if the returns (coefficients) on their observed characteristics had been the same as the returns on the MHHs’ characteristics. Even if that had been the case, however, results indicate that FHHs would still have been less food-secure than the MHHs due to unobservable characteristics.

Case Studies Stories from the field.

No matter what we do, we learn from it. See where we’ve been, what we’ve done, and what we learned – as well as how we’ve used those learnings to improve our work at scale.

Reaping the Benefits of New Knowledge from all over the world.

Together with our grassroots partners, we create digital solutions for rural communities around the world. Great ambitions, whether projects or specific objectives, can only be achieved together and for the common interest